AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I MISS ORGERON!!!!
|
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
|
Countdown to 2009 Kickoff |
| Author | Comment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RounderReb
|
OH MY GOD NOOOO!!!!! |
Lead | |||||
|
We got a 1-star commitment from Georgia and he wasn't on Yancy's hotlist.
AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I MISS ORGERON!!!! |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
hawghead |
#41 | ||||||
VanillaFace wrote: i don't know what all this talk of stars is about. i thought stars were meaningless. i was talking about adding up the 2 rankings and whichever team has the lowest total wins. i don't give a shit about stars much like every poster on this board. for a board that doesn't care about stars, y'all certainly talk about them alot. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
fillmoregandt |
Ark.'s average on Scout | #42 | |||||
|
Ark's avg = 2.78
OM's avg = 2.96 You suck again Ark. Next?? Well I hope it's not Jumbo shrimp because I'm allergic to oxymorons |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
RebelRichman |
Then take my bet | #43 | |||||
|
you obnoxious fuck. Stars mean jack shit so you want to combine two star ratings and get an average? Stop being a pussy. Whichever class wins the most games is
all that matters so take the bet or shut the fuck up.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
VanillaFace |
#44 | ||||||
|
Posts: 1029 Jan 19, 2009 7:55 PM Tool
|
hawghead wrote: You were the stupid cunt that said that we should base the bet OFF of a star system. You DO realize that the rankings are based off of the star system, right? |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
hawghead |
#45 | ||||||
RebelRichman wrote: let's look at in 3 yrs. hell, we had 18 true freshmen contribute this yr. that'll be down to approx 10-12 in 3 more yrs w/ this yrs class all being jr.s. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
RebelRichman |
Wins are all that matter, you're wasting your time trying to convince me to be concerned with stars. | #46 | |||||
|
If you want to bet on wins let me know, if not you are a pussy.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
gahogfan |
#47 | ||||||
VanillaFace wrote:Your BCS offer argument is every bit as week as the stars argument for the followings reasons: 1) Many recruits commit early and basically don't go through the process. Colby Berna, on of our OL commits, is like this. He could be the best prospect in our class and "only" has an offer from Arkansas b/c he committed the day after signing day and hasn't even taken calls from other coaches. Another example would be Austin Tate, our TE recruit from Harrison. He only shows an offer from Arkansas on the recruiting pages, and it doesn't reflect that Pete Carroll and Lane Kiffin were trying to get him to come on officials where he probably would have gotten an offer. 2) The vast majority of your commits "multiple BCS offers" includes State. Take them out of the equation and see where you fall. I'm guessing you won't like the answer. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
hawghead |
#48 | ||||||
RebelRichman wrote: wins are fine. let's start in 3 yrs when this class are jr.s. 8 sec reg season games only. i'll do this every yr you'd like to participate for $1k/year. i wonder how i'd have faired if we go back to when we joined the sec? one of you internet geeks look that up for me. i'm guessing that in approx 19 yrs of sec football, i'd be up $7 or $8k on you. any other bets you'd like to make at this time rebelrichman. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
gahogfan |
#49 | ||||||
fillmoregandt wrote: Scout is such a good service, it has the following ratings on our recruits: One-star QB Brandon Mitchell, who had an offer from Michigan and Arkansas despite being committed to play basketball for LSU until a couple of weeks ago. Two-star OL Shauntez Bruce, who had offers from Florida State, Ole Miss, South Carolina, and South Florida. Two-star LB Ben D'Aguliar, who we have dropped and is no longer committed. etc., etc. Do you have any idea why your scout rating is the ONLY school that doesn't really match up with the rivals ratings? I'm sure it has NOTHING to do with that fellow named Yancy. Keep telling yourself our class sucks. But even the Nutt-lovers in Arkansas agree that this will probably end up being the best class in recent Arkansas history. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
fis |
bro, i'm a hog ok? | #50 | |||||
hawghead wrote:I don't know how old you are, but you are making razorback fans look pretty stupid. Nutt is a proven winner in the Sec in 10 years. He's coached at one of the smallest home stadiums in the SEC 10 years, gone to 2 sec title games and tied for a third. He was 4 games over .500. He's knocked off Goliath far more often than he's been beat by someone with lesser tradition. What has Petrino done? he had a slightly better record than his predecessor John L Smith at Louisville. He inherited talent and kept it going in a weak conference. Well Nutt's last 2 years at Murry were similiar in record to Bobby's last 2, but Nutt had to build his program. Bobby inherited a good situation. So, I can't describe for you how silly the rankings in recruiting are right now. Louisville is struggling now. The gap in quality feb5 is not going to be enough that you can just write the game off as a win for either side. Who fucking cares what some drunk dipshit on rivals ranks the classes? If you do finish ahead of Ole Miss, but you get beat on the field, which that is what my money is on perhaps 7 out of the next 10 match ups, it just goes to show you got all this nice facilities and a premier coach, but lost to your old coach after he turned the table at his new program that he practically owned while he was here. So far other than one particular corner back from Arkansas, Petrino is not doing great on the defensive side of the ball. That's what you need to be concerned with. His offense won't be as effective against the upper echelon teams as you think it will.
Last Edited By: fis Jan 19, 2009 8:51 PM.
Edited 1 time.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
monkey11508 |
And do you not realize that Houston Nutt would have been a big part of that? | #51 | |||||
|
Posts: 1112 Jan 19, 2009 8:48 PM |
While the players might not have had the high star ratings, they definitely showed ability on the field.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
RebelRichman |
Yep, Nutt did amazing things at that little place. | #52 | |||||
Last Edited By: RebelRichman Jan 19, 2009 9:21 PM.
Edited 1 time.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Interpol |
Oh I see | #53 | |||||
|
It's a great system when it favors your argument.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
gahogfan |
#54 | ||||||
Interpol wrote:Why are you signing 5 running backs in this year's class? Don't you already have a shitload on campus? And what's with the only 8 lineman, total, you are signing? That seems a little odd....I'm used to seeing that at Arkansas, not Ole Miss. I wonder what's different this year? |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
drcurly |
Since Yancy is responsible for handing out the gold stars...** | #55 | |||||
|
asdf
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
fis |
#56 | ||||||
gahogfan wrote: you are really embarrasing yourself, and unbeknownst to you, you're solidifying the argument that the rankings aren't all they are cracked up to be for one more reason of many. Did it occur to you that some of his running backs will play defense? Please GA, you look dumber and dumber. As I've said before, maybe in teh future you can make your case that Nutt is a poor coach and BP is so much better, but right now no evidence exists, not even in the recruiting |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
uscreb |
Five running backs? | #57 | |||||
|
Our current class includes
Three Running Backs: Scott, Neat, and Hunter. Hunter is still iffy because of injury. One WR: Montez Phillips - the rumor mill says that because he is a hometown kid, he will greyshirt and eventually come aboard as an athlete. We will add atleast two more. Four OL's: We will add at least two others on schollie and probably one preferred walk-on Four DL's: We will add one more for sure and are in a foot race with Arkie for Williams Seven DB's: Four safeties and three CB's. One of the Safeties will probably move over to LB and we may Three LB's: We will probably add three more. Go make up shit somewhere else.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
RebelBruiser |
#58 | ||||||
|
Also, you have to consider that Neat is more of a scatback/slot WR in the Dexter McCluster mold, not a true every down tailback. Scott is the only true RB
we're signing. Hunter is either going to take a grayshirt or sign elsewhere. And the other guys that are listed as RBs are being recruited by our staff to
play other positions that they also played in high school/college.
Demond Washington will get a shot at the scat back/RB position, but there is a very good chance he ends up at CB before all is said and done. I'd say we needed one or two RBs in this class to fill the depth we'll lose when Eason is gone, and that's really all we've got. As I've said before, the only thing we're missing from this class is a QB, which we may end up getting with Cotton, and another OL or two, and we still have at least one or two on the board. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
gahogfan |
#59 | ||||||
uscreb wrote:So I missed by two RB's -- which is interesting and probably news to those kids b/c every single one seems to think they are going to be running the "wild-rebel" next year. And it looks like you just added one more OL. You beat out of UCF, Middle Tennessee, and South Alabama. Those schools look familiar on all of your OL/DL...interesting. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
JabbatheGut1 |
That reminds me... | #60 | |||||
And it looks like you just added one more OL. You beat out of UCF, Middle Tennessee, and South Alabama. Those schools look familiar on all of your OL/DL...interesting....Thanks for Markuson too... |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Disclaimer: "The administrators of NAFOOM reserve the right to create more rules as more and more stupid people post here. We do this only to protect the integrity of the intelligent conversation we hope you will bring to this board. We at NAFOOM believe that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and in that regard, we also reserve the right to blatantly rip-off the Six Pack at any time we feel it is necessary. We don't feel they'll mind, but if they do, they should let us know about it, and not you. 99.9% of rumors stated here are not true but for that 0.1%, we are definitely going to gloat about it. Neither this message board nor its rules and regulations are associated with the University of Mississippi or any other Ole Miss sports website. The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by Nafoom.com."